|
|
The Trade Act of 2002: What Does It All Mean?
by Erin Mewhirter and Michael Fullerton
ITA Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Principal
Negotiating Objectives under TPA
Section 2102 of the Trade Act of 2002 details 17 principal negotiating
objectives for agreements concluded under trade promotion authority.
These include:
Agriculture: Reduce or eliminate tariffs (or other charges),
giving priority to products that are subject to significantly
higher tariffs or subsidies; provide reasonable adjustment periods
for import-sensitive U.S. agricultural products; reduce or eliminate
subsidies that decrease U.S. exports or distort agricultural trade
to the detriment of the United States; address unjustified requirements
affecting new technologies, such as biotechnology and unjustified
sanitary and phytosanitary regulation; complete WTO negotiations
by January 1, 2005; seek the broadest possible market access in
all negotiations, recognizing the effect of simultaneous negotiations
on sensitive agricultural products.
Industrial Goods: Seek enhanced market access through elimination
of tariffs based on comprehensive product coverage, in particular
for those sectors subject to U.S. zero-for-zero or harmonization
initiatives in the Uruguay Round.
Services: Adopt trade disciplines to address discriminatory
and other barriers to services trade, including barriers that
deny national treatment and market access; pursue specialized
provisions for financial services, telecommunications, and other
sectors.
Labor and the Environment: Strengthen enforcement of core
labor standards and environmental laws; reduce or eliminate government
practices or policies that unduly threaten sustainable development;
seek market access for U.S. environmental technologies, goods,
and services.
Small Businesses: Ensure trade agreement provisions afford
small businesses equal access to markets, equitable benefits,
expanded market access, and reciprocal elimination of barriers.
Additional trade negotiating objectives concern intellectual property
rights, trade remedies, investment, child labor, and electronic
commerce. The full text of the Trade Act of 2002, including details
on each of the 17 principal negotiating objectives, can be found
at www.tpa.gov.
|
On August 6, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Trade Act of
2002, which provides the president with trade promotion authority
(TPA). This authority will allow the president to negotiate new trade
agreements with our trading partners, thereby opening markets to U.S.
products and services.
Other provisions of the Trade Act renew and enhance the benefits available
to Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru under the Andean Trade Preference
Act (ATPA). The act also expands the benefits, and clarifies the provisions
of, the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (CBERA) and the African
Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). In addition, the Generalized System
of Preferences (GSP) program was renewed and extended to December
31, 2006.
Under the provisions of the Trade Act, the United States will be able
to:
- Complete free trade agreements with Chile and Singapore in short
order. In addition to bilateral agreements with these two countries,the
United States will have the ability (and the credibility) to advance
its agenda in the new global trade negotiations, including the far-reaching
agricultural reform proposal announced in Geneva and aggressive
initiatives in services and industrial goods.
- Bring economic growth to our trading partners. The renewal of
vital trade preferences for Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia
under the ATPA will provide thousands of workers in those countries
with new employment opportunities.The amendments to the highly successful
African Growth and Opportunity Act also take effect right away,
helping to lift families out of poverty in Africa. The renewal of
the GSP, which had expired in September 2001, will effectively assist
thousands of workers in Caribbean nations (and in more than 100
other developing economies) to gain a foothold in the global economy.
- Initiate new negotiations for free trade agreements with Central
America and Morocco. The United States will also be able to consider
free trade agreements with other nations, such as Australia and
the countries of southern Africa. The administration has already
announced its commitment to put the completion of negotiations on
the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) on an aggressive timetable.
As President Bush has made clear, the enactment of the Trade Act
of 2002 was a win for the American people, for the U.S. economy, and
for the world economy at large. Starting now, said President
Bush at the signing ceremony, America is back at the bargaining
table in full force.
The Role of Congress
Under the Trade Act the president is required to notify Congress of
the specific negotiating objectives for any ongoing negotiations (for
example, those with Chile, Singapore, the FTAA, and the WTO). The
president must also notify Congress of the negotiating objectives
in any new negotiations 90 days before initiating such negotiations.
Under the provisions of the Trade Act, new trade agreements must adhere
to a set of principal negotiating objectives (see sidebar).
Congressional committees must be notified of negotiating objectives
with regard to agriculture, labor, and the environment. On agriculture,
the International Trade Commission must weigh in on the economic effects
of tariff reductions on U.S. industry. Congressional committees on
trade and agriculture will also be notified.
Once a trade agreement has been negotiated and the implementing legislation
introduced in Congress, action must occur within 90 days, and no amendments
will be permitted.
The Role of U.S. Industry
Trade agreements are already negotiated with input from private industry
through trade advisory committees. (See the December 2001 issue of
Export America for an in-depth look at these advisory committees.)
In addition, requests for comment are frequently published in the
Federal Register.
New Provisions for Renewed Trade Programs
The new Trade Act includes some provisions that affect existing trade
programs. These include:
- n The Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act (ATPDEA),
which renews and enhances benefits available to Bolivia, Ecuador,
Colombia, and Peru under a tariff preference program. The program
assists in the promotion of trade, stability, and the rule of law
in these countries. The president must designate a country as an
ATPDEA beneficiary country based on certain criteria that are defined
in the act. Under the ATPDEA, duty-free treatment is provided for
some products that were excluded under prior law and remain excluded
from duty-free treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences
program. Duty-free treatment for certain other products is available
only if the president determines that the product is not import-sensitive
in the context of imports from ATPDEA beneficiary countries. A very
limited number of products remain excluded from duty-free treatment.
- The Caribbean Basin Trade Policy Act (CBTPA), which modifies
certain provisions of the existing Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act (CBERA) program. These changes will, with one exception, become
effective immediately upon enactment. Four changes to the program
serve to harmonize apparel eligibility criteria between the regional
preference programs for Africa, the Andean countries, and the Caribbean.
The Future of Trade Promotion Authority
The Trade Act has a very specific timetable for continuation of trade
promotion authority. It allows the president to enter agreements under
its terms until June 1, 2005. For agreements negotiated after that
date, the act requires the president to submit a request to Congress
for extension of TPA. This request must be made no later than March
1, 2005. Accompanying reports that detail the economic effects of
the agreements negotiated under trade promotion authority must be
submitted to Congress by the International Trade Commission and the
Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Policy no later than
May 1, 2005. Congress will then have the opportunity, until June 30,
2005, to enact a resolution that denies TPA. If Congress does not
act, the procedures will continue in effect until July 1, 2007.
|